this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
925 points (99.1% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4364 readers
294 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _number8_ 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

what is the point of the distinction even? 'that is' make sense to introduce an example and vice versa

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

To add to the explanations, here are some examples that might help:
There are various transportation methods, e.g. cars

There are various transportation methods, i.e. ways for a person to move from one location to another

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess another way to put it is that "i.e." is more specific while "e.g." is more general. So "i.e." carries an energy of "I am referring very specifically to the following" while "e.g." means "there are other things that I'm not mentioning". So the use of "i.e." in the Tumblr post would imply that "tattoo", "sushi", and "guillotine" are the only loanwords in the English language.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One gives a definition or clarification and the other is a set of examples. If you do that with a word that your listener has never seen or heard before, you will miscommunicate.

Here watch when I use made up words:

I enjoy multifacetous martialific numbrate (i.e., chess).

If I selected carelessly, does this mean I like games or that I specifically like chess? Maybe here it doesn't matter, but what if I'm describing a category of things I'm allergic to vs a specific example? It's worth being able to articulate either case distinctly no?

[–] stevehobbes 4 points 1 year ago

Not just specific example. i.e. when used in contract law is a limited list of things covered.

Acts of god (i.e. fire or flood) would not include hail or rain or lightning or….

Acts of god (e.g. fire or flood) would include anything you could argue to a judge is an act of god.

If they use ie in a contract, you would first have to argue they didn’t mean to use ie and both parties believes them not to be a complete list, and were supposed to be examples of.