this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
71 points (92.8% liked)

Games

31991 readers
1991 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dlpkl 15 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Very unfortunate that it doesn't have seamless surface to space travel. It's 2023 Bethesda!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Bethesda's engine disallows that entirely. Everything has to be chunked into pieces with loading screens between -- every previous Bethesda game has done that, so it's not really a surprise.

Agree it would be neat, but I also already have No Man's Sky, and I'm looking forward to Bethesda competing on story.

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It blows my mind that Bethesda have owned id Software for over a decade and haven't at any point got them to make a version of id Tech engine for their games.

There's literally no reason the graphics wizards at id couldn't make a Bethesda branch of the engine that uses similar or identical workflows to Creation but also employs all the best practices for a modern open world engine.

Like, modders have made their own Open Morrowind engine from scratch, in their spare fucking time. It runs all the same files and all the same mods work, without any of the drawbacks of the Gamebryo engine. It would be trivial for id's engineers, with their experience and resources, to make something better. For some reason Bethesda just... keep bolting new shit to the creaking husk of their old engine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd argue it would be smarter to upgrade CE to meet modern standards than creating a branch of id's software while porting all of existing Bethesda tools.

we don't have access to the source so we can't really say things are bolted on. it's also possible that code is removed as it's made obsolete.

I don't think you would have to create an entirely new engine to support elite dangerous type of warping, or elevators even now they could make the illusion better

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)