this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2238 points (94.3% liked)

World News

39099 readers
3915 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nuclear power is the ONLY form of clean energy that can be scaled up in time to save us from the worst of climate change

Except the plants take so long to build they won't be ready until we're at 2°C

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It has been fifty years that "oh no they take so long to build, better never start" that by today we would have completely decarbonized energy generation if we started actually building them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

We could have also built solar collectors in orbit and beamed carbon-free electricity to Earth if we started 50 years ago.

Heck, if we funded fusion research properly there's a good chance we'd have had that by the mid 90s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, not it's to late so think about something else

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was too late ten years ago
It is too late today
It will be too late in ten years
It is always too late.

But weirdly it is never too late to be anti nuclear power.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is also never to late to go full green energies and cut the useless spending such as private jets, luxury yatchs and son on

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

How are you gonna cut that spending?

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Knowing nothing about the process, can i ask, is the time it takes to build one based on current standards? Like if we were to focus more resources into the construction of new plants wouldnt they be built faster?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The latest nuclear power plant built in the US is seven years behind schedule and almost $20 billion over budget. It bankrupted Westinghouse Energy, and is slated to cost consumers more than double what comparable electricity costs because of these overruns.

And this was a plant that was using newer construction techniques like offsite assembly to reduce costs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were there mistakes during the build process like lowballing spending figures or building time so they are permitted to build or did they just royally fuck up some other way?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It just seems to be a general issue in the industry and not specific to this plant or the US.

Flamanville-3 in France is 5 years overrun already and is projected to be operational 12 years from now. It's budget ballooned from 3.3B to 20B euros.

Olkiluoto-3 was only delayed a year, but the budget went from 3 to 11B Euro.

Hinkley Point C project is behind and esyimates have gone from £16B to almost £30B.

[–] LordOfTheChia 3 points 1 year ago

Looks like one holdup nowadays is the ability to source HALEU (Uranium that is 4x as enriched as the typical fuel used in current reactors).

https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/what-high-assay-low-enriched-uranium-haleu

https://www.wyomingpublicmedia.org/natural-resources-energy/2022-12-14/the-opening-of-terrapowers-nuclear-plant-in-kemmerer-will-be-delayed-by-two-years

It was sourceable from Russia before they invaded Ukraine.