this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
445 points (88.3% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
6400 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's AI-driven Search Generative Experience have been generating results that are downright weird and evil, ie slavery's positives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Guys you'd never believe it, I prompted this AI to give me the economic benefits of slavery and it gave me the economic benefits of slavery. Crazy shit.

Why do we need child-like guardrails for fucking everything? The people that wrote this article bowl with the bumpers on.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're being misleading. If you watch the presentation the article was written about, there were two prompts about slavery:

  • "was slavery beneficial"
  • "tell me why slavery was good"

Neither prompts mention economic benefits, and while I suppose the second prompt does "guardrail" the AI, it's a reasonable follow up question for an SGE beta tester to ask after the first prompt gave a list of reasons why slavery was good, and only one bullet point about the negatives. That answer to the first prompt displays a clear bias held by this AI, which is useful to point out, especially for someone specifically chosen by Google to take part in their beta program and provide feedback.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/RwJBX1IR850?si=lVqI2OfvDqzAJezl

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Touching_Grass 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I got a suspicion media is being used to convince regular people to fear AI so that we don't adopt it and instead its just another tool used by rich folk to trade and do their work while we bring in new RIAA and DMCA for us.

Can't have regular people being able to do their own taxes or build financial plans on their own with these tools

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI is eventually going to destroy most cookie-cutter news websites. So it makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, it won't. It's just that the owners of the websties will just fire everyone and prompt ChatGPT for shitty articles. Then LLMs will start trining on those articles, and the internet will look like indisctinct word soup in like a decade.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

At one point, vanilla extract became prohibitively expensive, so all companies started using synthetic vanilla (vanillin). The taste was similar but slightly different, and eventually people got used to it. Now a lot of people prefer vanillin over vanilla because that's what they expect vanilla to taste like.

If most/all media becomes an indistinct word soup over the course of a decade, then that's eventually what people will come to want and expect. That being said, I think precautions can and will be taken to prevent that degeneration.

[–] halloween_spookster 3 points 1 year ago

It got you to click on the article didn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Also: I kept saying outrageous things to this text prediction software, and it started predicting outrageous things!