this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7576 readers
120 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In particular, whatever politicians say, the Republican-controlled House has a rider in the FAA authorization bill which requires airports to continue selling leaded fuel for propeller aircraft forever:

The House version of the bill would require airports that receive federal grants to continue selling the same fuels they sold in 2018 in perpetuity.

While the Democratically-controlled Senate requires a phase-out:

The Senate version would require these airports to continue selling the same fuels they sold in 2022, with a sunset date of 2030 or whenever unleaded fuels are “widely available.”

For context, the FAA approved sale of unleaded fuel for all propeller planes last year, and there are local efforts to ban the sale of leaded fuel in locations where the unleaded fuel is now available

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (19 children)

What a weird thing to fight over. The Democrat policy seems reasonable.

That said, I don't know how many propeller aircraft we actually have so I don't know how much of an impact leaded fuel actually has, but i don't see a good reason to continue using it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (14 children)

This is for personal aircraft, so there are thousands.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (13 children)

So probably minimal impact. It seems weird that it's so divisive then. How about no federal requirements or restrictions on leaded fuel for aircraft, but instead throw on a tax to encourage switching? That sounds pretty reasonable to me, and given that the environmental impact is pretty low, that's about all the government should need to do.

It was a problem for cars because of how many there were, but I'm not aware of any issues with the scale of these aircraft. But maybe I'm missing something.

[–] Hnazant 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They doing rebates for gas stoves in Florida.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What does this have to do with leaded fuel in aircraft?

[–] Hnazant 1 points 2 years ago

Tax incentive to switch the bad way.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)