this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
480 points (81.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19817 readers
711 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, firewalls should use openBSD

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why?
I've tried to Google this, but it's such a general statement I can't find anything about it.
Is it more mature in that regard? Sane/sensible/safe defaults for networking? More tools as part of the distribution for networking?
Did FreeBSD (or it's predecessor/upstream/whatever) define the standards, so the implementation is more correct?

Or is it just that so many firewall applications run on top of FreeBSD (or a BSD flavour) eg opnSense, pfSense, openWRT (is openWRT actually BSD, idk)?
So, kinda a historical/momentum thing. With the benefits of wide spread specific use

[–] Rolando 4 points 1 year ago

I personally don't have a lot of experience with this, but here's a writeup about OpenBSD: https://nxdomain.no/~peter/what_every_it_person_needs_to_know_about_openbsd.html

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

OpenBSD is focused on being incredibly secure, and they generally succeed. Firewalls need good security.

[–] linearchaos 2 points 1 year ago

FreeBSD this focused on making a general use operating system

Open BSD is focusing on security the developer insists on regular audits.

Under most circumstances I wouldn't really care, we're getting a long well enough on Microsoft and Android with security updates all the time. That firewall man, it's sitting out there with its ass hanging in the wind, The only thing between you and a billion hastily written scripts.