this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
2289 points (96.8% liked)

Linus Tech Tips

1053 readers
3 users here now

~~⚠️ De-clickbait-ify the youtube titles or your post will be removed!~~

~~Floatplane titles are perfectly fine.~~

~~LTT/LMG community. Brought to you by ******... Actually, no, not this time. This time it's brought to you by Lemmy, the open communities and free and open source software!~~

~~If you post videos from Youtube/LTT, please please un-clickbait the titles. (You can use the title from https://nitter.net/LTTtranslator/ but it doesn't seem to have been updated in quite some while...)~~

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 


Some updates I got from threadreaderapp:

Link to the thread provided by @[email protected].

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 230 points 1 year ago (4 children)

None of this is surprising to me at all. I’ve been seeing hints of a toxic ‘hustle’ mindset in their videos for quite some time and have commented as much on the videos. I’ve worked in environments just like this and once you’ve lived it it’s easy af to spot.

Linus probably says ‘I don’t ask anything of anyone that I don’t expect of myself’ and then goes on to expect someone making 50k to put in as much time and effort as he did when first starting LTT/LMG.

[–] MotoAsh 116 points 1 year ago

That is seriously my biggest gripe about employers... They think our pittance motivates us as much as their fortune.

Yea, I'll get it done by the end of the week! Let's trade paychecks and I'll f*cking get it done real fast...

[–] Serinus 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My comment on the forums was very similar.

The key issue in all of this that they didn't address is that they're pushing too fast. There have been many red flags about Linus pushing people too hard to get stuff done too fast.

It doesn't matter what kind of "new processes" you put in place if people just don't have time. And you can't expect every employee to work as though they have 20% equity in the company. If you put more than 30 hours of work per week onto a full time, salaried employee, you're not going to get their best work, especially in creative or expertise-required jobs.

To do their best work, people need time to breathe. They need time to be able to talk to their coworkers about a problem without worry about pulling them away from their own work for 15 minutes. They need time to grab a drink or a sandwich while they step back from a problem and consider it from a distance. They need time to decide their previous work wasn't good enough and to go back and redo it. They shouldn't have to ask. Having to ask is a problem. Getting "no" back as an answer is an even bigger problem.

If you try to account for every 15 minutes, you're going to get shit quality product pushed out the door.

Madison brought this up. Employees have brought this up in videos. And Linus has raised red flags more than once. The biggest was with his equating doing things right to hours worked and directly to cash. That speaks to exactly this. People don't have time to do things right, and they don't have time to fix things.

The only way to fix this is to either hire more people (which you clearly can't afford), or allow your current people to put out less product.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

If you put more than 30 hours of work per week onto a full time, salaried employee, you’re not going to get their best work, especially in creative or expertise-required jobs.

Facts. If you claim you can work more than ~30 maybe 40 hours (that's really pushing it) a week in this type of work without output/quality falling off a cliff, you have lots of room for process automation from my experience. I don't think I do more than ~15-20 hours of actual active programming per week. If I have hard deadlines, pushing that out to 60-80 hours does increase output but nowhere close to linear output.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And as other people said, she was expected to output that much social media posts, but now they post the bare minimum. Maybe she was being asked too much after all.

[–] raltoid 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You don't hire your partner as the head of HR unless you want to hide a bad work enviroment.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right? How do you go to HR if he harasses you? Yeah so I know y'all live together but like it's really bad?

[–] Saintpaul 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I thought she was head of accounting. I didn’t realize HR. Conflict of interest much?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

You're right actually. Point still stands somewhat, the whole thing is fucked

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Didn't Coulton mention HR was his purview?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

U do that when u think its a stupit position that doesnt really mather when u got a company of 10 to 20 people. When u hire lets say 90 poeple it starts to breakdown.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Stopped watching years ago because something about the videos were starting to put me off. Now I know.