this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1610 points (98.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32710 readers
56 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] douglasg14b 113 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (19 children)

So, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it's about as good as any first-pass bash script.

It'd be a stretch to call it malware, it's probably an outright fabrication to call it a virus.

[–] DrinkBoba 121 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wasn't sure about it either. There's security researchers out there who might genuinely want to get a virus to run in a VM.

But yeah, the cmalw-lib-2.0 gives it away...

[–] BloodSlut 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, nobody uses cmalw-lib-2.0

Its deprecated, now we use hack-lib-client-1.17

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

systemd-malwared and its front-end malctl are how the cool kids are doing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Not too long ago, when Fracturiser was a concern on Minecraft, and I read up on it, I got a chuckle when I read that stage 2 was a systemd service, and therefore couldn't have run on my machine even if it had gotten that far (of course, I still checked for signs of infection)

[–] BloodSlut 2 points 2 years ago

systemd haters will moan and groan about 'bloat' and 'unnecessary end-user hacking libraries' smh

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wasn’t sure about it either

It ends with them donating money to the malware's creator...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Yes, that is odd, but not impossible either. I've seen influencers do dumb shit like that for the attention.

load more comments (17 replies)