this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
551 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19129 readers
2621 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, said in the report that it plans to continue to investigate Biden to find evidence of corruption, even as it acknowledged that it had no evidence that he financially benefited from the myriad foreign business dealings of his son Hunter.

https://archive.li/e7d6j

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This ignores the fact that Hillary is deeply unlikeable and thus unelectable. imho you’re giving repug disinformation too much credit here.

[–] etlaser 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah well considering her opponent…

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Rofl

Why exactly do so many people find her unlikeable?

I'll give you a hint, it rhymes with "Depublucan propaganda"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. I remember in the 2008 primaries I was talking to someone about how Obama was a better pick than Clinton because she just felt unlikeable. I did some self reflection at the time and realized that's because Republicans had been running a constant smear campaign against her since the early 90s. It's crazy how effective that long term propaganda is. It leaves people with a generally bad feeling about someone, even if they can't quite articulate why.

[–] Redditiscancer789 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean I let her actions speak for themselves like when she said no one should be too big to fail yet her top campaign donations where from a bunch of banks that were bailed out in 2008. Plus her marriage to Bill. That's already 2 strikes against her judgement.

[–] TheLowestStone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also just think she always sounds disingenuous when she speaks. Something in her tone gives me powerful used car salesmen vibes.

[–] Redditiscancer789 1 points 1 year ago

"PoKeMoN gO To ThE pOlLs CaUsE iTs My TiMe"

Fucking clown shoes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unaffiliated Voter here that leans left and used to sometimes vote Republican until Trump. I'll never even consider doing so again until the R Platform clearly acknowledges the J6 Coup Attempt and holds it's own members that were complicit accountable.

Having said that, to hell with Hillary. Wasn't one of her slogans 'It's Her Turn!' or something? Sorry, no. I am against any political dynasties, be they Clinton, Bush, Kennedy, or any of the others. She is the epitome of a cringe politician.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nope. That was an attack Ad which many Billionaire owned aired as if it were her campaign slogan. It originated as an idea some staffer pitched which was rejected. The media all pretended Hillary said it and the population accepted that as a given, after all they'd had thirty Years of GQP propaganda about how entitled and bossy she was. https://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-slogan-why-run-because-her-turn-2017-4 She never said it nor used it as a campaign slogan.

[–] AbidanYre 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Something, something, vast right-wing conspiracy.

Turns out she was right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I disagree, she just doesn’t have good charisma or stage presence. Remember the balloon drop? I mean come on bro, she was passing for reptilian in that moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Disagree. She just comes off as cold and disconnected. She just wants power. And I'm a democrat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Have you actually listened to her?

This quote:

“It took a Clinton to clean up after the first Bush, it may take another Clinton to clean up after the second one”.

Ah yes, Bill Clinton who - checks notes - signed a bill putting another 100k cops on the street and introduced corporation friendly trade agreements that hurt workers (NAFTA) for starters. He was the worst kind of democrat, one that does what the Republicans want to do but act like it's some sort of progressive act and she's the exact same.

As Sec of State, she put ridiculous sanctions on Iran, she was the driving force behind completely fucking destroying Libya and in general, she's a war hawk who will invade any country it takes to uphold the status quo regardless of the impact to the people. You can argue that is practically any politician in the system (and you'd be right) but she has a proven track record of it.

For more, read here https://www.currentaffairs.org/2021/12/the-toxic-positivity-of-hillary-clintons-masterclass-in-resilience.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Libya

Lol y'all still believe that shit? Buttery males? Ben Gassy?