this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
76 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

59982 readers
4137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘It’s already way beyond what humans can do’: will AI wipe out architects?::It’s revolutionising building – but could AI kill off an entire profession? Perhaps not, finds our writer, as he enters a world where Corbusier-style marvels and 500-room hotels are just a click away

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] garretble 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we hurry and spin up these AIs to make these cookie cutter neighborhoods not just look like the absolute worst? Can we get some house variety going on?

I know it’s to drive down costs to build, but it seems like every new neighborhood that’s being built looks absolutely soulless and dreadful to live in.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As you said, it's based on building costs. No reason for AI to change this whatsoever

[–] ericisshort 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could maybe use AI to design a bunch of variations on one design with the same or less building cost.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That wouldn't work because it's the variation itself that leads to increased cost. It's just easier and cheaper to build the same thing over and over. You can have superficial changes like having some houses flipped but AI can't really help there.

[–] WestwardWinds 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did a lot of that work when I was starting out. Trust me, not a fan anymore than you are. But the developers that buy up all the land and do the construction are, which I hate but understand. What I didn't understand is that, your average SFDH buyer loves that shit. There were times I was cranking out tweaked designs for 15-20 builds a week across 3-5 neighborhoods. People would come to our company specifically because of that "cookie cutter" design. They loved it and loved paying for it with just a couple tweaks. They knew that there were just tweaked versions of maybe 3 house styles in the entire neighborhood and they loved the suburb feel. Me personally? I've always hated the suburb vibe since I was a kid but that's what paid the bills until I could go back to school and get something I cared about off the ground

[–] garretble 1 points 1 year ago

That’s wild. I just can’t imagine thinking only a few designs — that lets be honest still look really similar — is…good. It may be cheaper, but all those neighborhoods are so ugly.

And that’s not to even mention all the trees they pull up to put down the houses, so it’s just these cookie cutter homes with no old, tall trees in sight. Just awful.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are usually restrictions about what kind of house you're allowed to build on which neighbourhood. It's not so much about the money or unability to design cool buidings. You can't get a permit for a house that's completely different from all the others.

[–] garretble 1 points 1 year ago

And that’s ridiculous in and of itself.