this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
258 points (68.3% liked)
conservative
975 readers
3 users here now
A community to discuss conservative politics and views.
Rules:
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.
-
No spam posting.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
-
No trolling.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well you did a poor job of not getting into a discussion about definitions- lol. But I don't really care. People who declare their ideology pre-discussion are self-enforcing their chosen ideology as dogma, so pick whatever term you prefer.
Then what is the value of that label, or any? Why not just express your ideas on their own merit and avoid the association altogether?
I mean at least I'm not arguing that you have to use my definitions or that my definition is the only correct one. I kinda have to know how you use the term to understand, but now that I do, I don't have an issue using the term "ideology" the way you do.
In my opinion, there is not a lot of value in labels. I agree with you here. That's why I try to avoid them.
But sometimes, people will start to apply their own labels on you regardless and it will often be labels that don't fit. And at that point, I will rather use my own label than have a label that I don't like be applied to me.
In those circumstances I recommend turning it around on them and make them explain why they assumed a label for you. Let them expose their own ridiculous team name biases. Or better yet just ignore them because anyone who speaks to you as a representative of an ideology isn't really speaking to you at all.