this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
118 points (95.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9788 readers
1121 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was told we can't build transit because we'd have to take private property via eminent domain, what gives?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DougHolland 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never been to Massachusetts and hate IHOP, but eminent domain troubles me. It ought to be used rarely, and only for projects that undeniably build a better community.

A frickin' parking garage does not merit taking by eminent domain.

[–] utopianfiat 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it should be more straightforward for transit projects

[–] DougHolland 4 points 1 year ago

For an improved streetcar or rapid transit line, absolutely use eminent domain.