this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20689 readers
3944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh wow, who would have thought... The corrupt MAGA SCOTUS turns against Trump.

Of course, the usual suspects Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, voted against the United States and for Trump. But five more justices outvoted the corrupt bastards.

FInally some good news: justice isn't completely dead in the US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scripthook 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yet his exec order stated that only the President and the AG can interpret the law in the Exec Branch so he won’t accept any SCOTUS rulings against his admin because he knows they’re not enforcable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

That's not quite what it says. When you're a federal employee who gets fired by BigBallz, but you say "I fall under xyz law and I cannot be fired this way", the EO says you're not allowed to do that. The President and AG does, and of course they're going to rubber stamp the action.

What that means is that those employees have to fight it in court the hard way, even though the law is clear and obvious.