this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

64073 readers
7870 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
enu
technopagan
L4s
89
This DOGE staffer’s GitHub posts might help us understand how Elon Musk wants to bring AI into the government (Jordan Wick’s) (www.fastcompany.com)
submitted 1 day ago by mesamunefire to c/technology
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wick posted the code for a tool that automatically downloads DMs from Twitter accounts. The code specifies Twitter accounts, which existed only until the social platform rebranded to “X” in October 2023, suggesting the possibility that the tool could be used to search through the digital past of government employees looking for disagreeable opinions or references.

Another tool appeared to be designed for collecting sensitive data from government agency org charts. The tool contained fields for capturing the employee’s office, a 1-5 satisfaction rating, union status, and whether or not their position is statutorily mandated.

Well, that's interesting. The guys who are determining who to lay off are apparently using union status as an input.

Is the Executive Branch taking someone's union status into account in making a firing decision legal? I'm pretty sure that it's not for private business.

https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/the-law/discriminating-against-employees-because-of-their-union

Discriminating against employees because of their union activities or sympathies (Section 8(a)(3))

It is unlawful to discourage (or encourage) union activities or sympathies "by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment." For example, employers may not discharge, lay off, or discipline employees, or refuse to hire job applicants, because they are pro-union.

I believe that that also applies to government. That seems like it might be some pretty juicy meat for the public sector union lawyers to work with.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

Is [that] legal?

The question of legality hinges on the courts' willingness to hear the case and make a judgement. Doesn't matter how many public sector union lawyers press charges if they end up thrown out by corrupt judges.

In other words: Darth Sidious Voice "I will make it legal"