this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
139 points (97.9% liked)

News

26249 readers
5554 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article is paywalled after three paragraphs. Related link in comments.

A Department of Homeland Security unit eliminated policies prohibiting personnel from conducting intelligence activities based solely on a person’s gender identity or sexual orientation.

The Office of Intelligence and Analysis posted an updated policy manual late last week that removes references to those characteristics in sections that set guardrails on gathering intelligence.

The revisions follow President Donald Trump’s Jan. 20 directive to scrap policies and protections focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion across federal agencies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatakuNox 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Ya that's right! Let's have the Department of Homeland Security focusing on what's in someone's pants and not, you know. HOMELAND FUCKING SECURITY!?

But in all seriousness. Why does that department even exists? I'm sure their work is covered by the FBI and CIA just fine.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why does that department even exists?

9/11, fear, turrists, freedom fries, 'murica. Things in the early 2000s got weird.

I am deeply sorry to gen-z and younger. They will never know what the US was like before the stupid times. For them, this is normal.

[–] rigatti 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'm squarely millenial and I don't even really know what it was like before the stupid times.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 5 days ago

Imgaine if not everything and everywhere was 100% focused on tracking where you go who you talk to and what you do.

Like that. But with lo-res games.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I walked into Canada without any ID. Boarder guards asked "You American?" I answered yup and they waved me through.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

From a Canadian perspective:

As a child (not even a teen), my friend and I would travel to the US alone, on a bus, with only our birth certificates and some hockey cards. We would walk to the arena and wait around to try to get autographs.

As a teen/20's we would pile in a car, drive across the border to bars or see concerts or afterhours clubs.

There used to be 20,000 american kids every weekend coming across here because the drinking age is 19 vs 21 over there.

Also, selfies and cellphones didn't exist yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I have vague memories of getting into Canada with a fake ID my Dad made when I was really young. 😁

[–] dualphasesaber 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In the wake of 9/11 it reported that the FBI/CIA/NSA all some information about the attacks before they happened, but no single one of them had enough of it to figure out what exactly was going to happen and when, and had no dedicated channels for coordinating on that sort of thing.

DHS was then (theoretically) created to solve that problem.

[–] NatakuNox 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Sounds to me like poor leadership and communication from other departments. Creating a whole new department when emails, phone calls, meetings, and generally giving a shit would solve the problem is waste we can do something about.

[–] dualphasesaber 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At the scale those agencies operate at that sort of coordination requires a level of bureaucracy, especially when you consider that we're talking about intelligence agencies who are often, by the very nature of their jobs, looking at vague incomplete pictures of things.

We're not talking about 3 or 4 agencies here, we're talking more like 25 so without some sort of centralized department even knowing who you may need to email about any one thing is easier said than done. (And that's keeping in mind that with just a small bit of a picture that the thing you want to talk to someone about could be nothing.)

That's not to say that there's no bloat in the US intelligence apparatus, but your comment feels like a wild oversimplification of the problem the agency was intended to address

[–] NatakuNox 1 points 5 days ago

If our intelligence agencies are too bloated to even communicate or form a joint task force to resolve basic issues like sharing information than the last thing we need is another agency/department. Yes it's very complex but not on this issue. It's there anything the DHS is doing that is unique or not already covered by another department?