this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
44 points (72.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
269 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

YDI

Like it or not, it is a widely known fact that the exact things you said are instance bannable.

The instance rules as they exist are explained in multiple places, and it is our choice as users to either follow them or stay away. If we choose to do neither of those, banning is the only real tool an admin has with current lemmy development. If there were other options available, and the instance ban was applied as a first step, I'd say PTB (though it would be PTA in this case).

Seriously, I get that the world as a whole, and each given language has to figure out what is and isn't a gender, what is and isn't going to become part of the consensus of a language. I have my own opinion about that line, but this isn't the venue for that.

But that instance, they have drawn their line, and did so last year, before the events in these screen shots. It's like travelling to another US state, there are going to be some laws that differ, and it's the travelers responsibility to follow them even if they disagree with them, or there are consequences.

I get it, I do. But, I'm sorry, this is absolutely on you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The problem here to my mind is that this was a ban for a "thought crime" and it was on another instance. OP always uses peoples preferred pronouns, even if he thinks they don't make sense, as in this case, so he hasn't broken any instance rules afaik. Is there a rule about not being allowed to even discuss neopronouns? On another instance? That is getting very dystopian imo. Unless someone can point to a rule that says you can't even discuss the topic of neopronouns, then this is clearly a case of over-reach imo. PTB

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The rule isn't about discussing anything, the rule is about making directed commentary on the validity of other users' gender, which serves as a honeypot for more hateful behavior. Ada has been explicit and open about this and Pug is not the first to receive a preemptive ban for off-instance action.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago

So yes to thought crime then.

[–] PugJesus 0 points 19 hours ago

and Pug is not the first to receive a preemptive ban for off-instance action.

I don't think that comes off the way you think it does.

[–] PugJesus -2 points 20 hours ago

The instance rules as they exist are explained in multiple places, and it is our choice as users to either follow them or stay away.

I literally have not posted in any Blahaj comm in months.

It’s like travelling to another US state, there are going to be some laws that differ, and it’s the travelers responsibility to follow them even if they disagree with them, or there are consequences.

But I'm not the traveler here. These comments were not in Blahaj.