this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
200 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

63730 readers
3669 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cort 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

No dummy, you're missing a decimal point. California only pays 19 CENTS per kwh.

And if conservative Texas is so great how come they pay 20% more per kwh for electricity than deep blue Washington State?

Everything's bigger in Texas, especially the idiots & excuses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Washington State?

Washing State has a ton of hydro, because they get a ton of rain in the mountains, thus near-constant hydro power supply. That really won't work in Texas.

I live in Utah and we have pretty average prices (about $0.12-0.13/kWh), which is pretty decent considering we have a competitive amount of renewables and a similar lack of hydro options.

I grew up in WA and we had a lot of cool classes about the geography of the region, especially things like the Grand Coulee Dam. I even took my kids there to show how hydro works. We have dams here in UT, but they're mostly to preserve water for the summer when we get almost no precipitation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Deep blue Washington state has the advantage of giant amounts of hydroelectric generation combined with a relatively small population to consume it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Washington has hydroelectric sources. 67 percent of its power is from hydro sources. Wind and solar are a tiny portion of its energy mix. Even nuclear power exceeds its wind and solar energy sources. Texas has proven it can scale energy sources the fastest. Texas has the most renewable energy in the US. It has the most solar and wind energy of any state. Washington isn't a top manufacturing state. It can't handle the demand load and Texas has the highest energy demand because it is a top manufacturing state. When you are dealing with energy intensive manufacturing, costs add up, go ask the Germans. The Texas grid is just better.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage 3 points 3 days ago

The Texas grid is just better.

As a Texan who has lost power, for weeks at a time, 4 times in the last 10 years, I disagree. I live near a major city and we lose power almost every time there's strong wind, rain, or sub-freezing temps. Maybe you're just lucky to live where you live? I've lived all over my city, and it's surrounding suburbs, and it's been pretty much the same everywhere.