this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
871 points (97.2% liked)

News

23402 readers
4334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Three plaintiffs testified about the trauma they experienced carrying nonviable pregnancies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragonflyteaparty 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which was the point of Roe V Wade. Abortions were cut off at viability.

[–] MasterObee -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, unfortunately, I think it's just bad law. I think it'd be okay legislatively, which is why it's sooooo incredibly odd that the democrats didn't codify RvW despite having many many many opportunities. But ultimately, I think it was a terribly ruled case that I think the SC was right to overturn. Fun fact, RBG also shares my belief.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 0 points 1 year ago

They didn't actually have so many opportunities. Yes, it's terrible that it isn't enshrined in law, but no. Don't blame Democrats when they didn't have near as much chance as everyone claims.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 0 points 1 year ago

They didn't actually have so many opportunities. Yes, it's terrible that it isn't enshrined in law, but no. Don't blame Democrats when they didn't have near as much chance as everyone claims.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't actually have so many opportunities. Yes, it's terrible that it isn't enshrined in law, but no. Don't blame Democrats when they didn't have near as much chance as everyone claims.

[–] MasterObee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They had dozens of opportunities..

Don’t blame Democrats when they didn’t have near as much chance as everyone claims.

Yes they did. They didn't so idiots would keep voting for them and to say that your rights are 'under attack'

Have you heard of Stockholm syndrome? That's where you're at.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where are the dozens of times that Democrats have had the majority Senate, House, and the presidency? You said specifically dozens, therefore there must have been dozens of democratic presidents who had a full democratic Congress. Who were all of these presidents?

[–] MasterObee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1977-1979 under jimmy carter 1993-1995 under bill clinton 2007-2011 under Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_States_Congresses

You said specifically dozens, therefore there must have been dozens of democratic presidents who had a full democratic Congress.

Not necessarily, it could be 10 times over 2 years.

Regardless, I've listed at least 12 years that democrats had a president and majorities in senate and congress - yet, not once did they enshrine what you argue is a human right. Either they didn't think it's a human right, they didn't want to codify it, or it's just not high on their priority list. They've had plenty of opportunities, you only got the dems to blame.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 1 points 1 year ago

I was unaware that the entirety of Obama's had a democratic majority both houses of Congress. Gonna check into that along with the other presidents. It would be pretty incredible for all three presidents to have a democratic majority in both houses for the whole presidency.