this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
312 points (91.1% liked)

News

25359 readers
4345 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The top 10% of earners—households making about $250,000 a year or more—are splurging on everything from vacations to designer handbags, buoyed by big gains in stocks, real estate and other assets.

Those consumers now account for 49.7% of all spending, a record in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. Three decades ago, they accounted for about 36%.

The top-level post uses a gift link. When it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And you're proving my point about this being a waste of time. But that's fine. It's fine if you get so riled up that you need to call me a liar and insecure and claiming I want to derail whatever soapbox you're on. I don't care because at the end of the day I'm not the one telling minimum wage workers, who can't afford to save money, that all they need to do is just save more money. Unlike you I know what being poor means, which is why I know what you're saying is compete garbage. But hey, don't let me stop you from letting everyone know what you are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're not a minimum wage worker, bub. This is what I mean by why should you get more before others who have less?

Why should we improve your lifestyle in the big city because you're "too good" to accept a more modest and affordable lifestyle outside of one? You're not willing to invest in making more places livable and improving the lives of others, you're just looking for ways to justify your entitlement to have as much as you can get.

It's not a big surprise. I don't expect more from people like you at this point. I would be foolish if I did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's amazing how confidently wrong you can be.

You’re not a minimum wage worker, bub. This is what I mean by why should you get more before others who have less?

I am not a minimum wage worker and I never said I was. I'm relatively well off and I think everyone should be able to have a life similar to mine, in terms of fulfillment. I don't demand more for myself, I demand more for everyone else because I don't think anyone deserves to be poor and needing to deal with the stress of having no money.

Why should we improve your lifestyle in the big city

I don't live in a big city. I live in a small town because I have the luxury of working remotely.

you’re “too good” to accept a more modest

I live a pretty modest life, some might even call it frugal. I don't own a car because it's a huge money sink. I cook my own meals because eating out is expensive. I don't buy cheap clothes but I do buy clothes that last a long time because if they last longer I end up spending less money on clothes. I don't really spend much money outside of necessities and the occasional entertainment.

affordable lifestyle outside of one

I have a budget and I stick to it. I have no problem having an affordable lifestyle.

You’re not willing to invest in making more places livable and improving the lives of others

I contribute to my local community. I would be more specific but I honestly have no fucking idea what you're even trying to imply here.

you’re just looking for ways to justify your entitlement to have as much as you can get.

Wrong once again.

It’s not a big surprise. I don’t expect more from people like you at this point. I would be foolish if I did.

I absolutely agree because I'm not at all surprised how you can be so confidently wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Man, if only you put this much effort into advocating for a modest lifestyle.

It just goes to show: you don't want to solve these problems because you benefit from them.

You're also just straight up lying at this point. It's crazy how much effort you are putting into this, but it's to be expected because of your cognitive dissonance.

I'm not going to sift through or quote your bullshit, but we both know that it's there. Keep trying to justify your entitlement, bud. I will always see it for what it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I guess it's time for your meds because you're starting to speak complete nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Lol. I guess that's the end of your argument.

I accept your concession.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Duh, kinda hard to argue anything when all you get is word vomit. but hey, I'll give my best effort then.

Man, if only you put this much effort into advocating for a modest lifestyle.

Erm, what? Have you read nothing I've said? I said getting rid of consumerism would be a net benefit to society, but I'm not going to advocate the stupidity that you're peddling.

It just goes to show: you don’t want to solve these problems because you benefit from them.

Clearly you didn't bother to actually explain how I benefit so I actually have no fucking clue what you're trying to say here. Considering I was pretty explicit in wanting others to be paid a fair wage so they'd have a better life I will happily be selfish in wanting a better life for others. I'll that selfishness over whatever you are.

And that was were your post ended but because you're foaming from the mouth you can't gather your before you post so you added an edit. And just for the sake of clarity, I posted my previous comment before the edit you added. Not that it matters because it's not like your edits are making any more sense.

You’re also just straight up lying at this point. It’s crazy how much effort you are putting into this, but it’s to be expected because of your cognitive dissonance.

So your counter-argument here is that I'm just straight up lying and then you proceed to insult. However once again you don't bother explaining anything so there's nothing to argue.

And then of course you couldn't stop there, you had to edit once again because thinking before speaking is not a skill you have.

I’m not going to sift through or quote your bullshit, but we both know that it’s there. Keep trying to justify your entitlement, bud. I will always see it for what it is.

Oh please do (I know you won't because that would take actual effort), because I think you haven't bothered to check who you're arguing with and you think I'm someone else. That's how little attention you paying to this discussion.

Now kindly accept my concession with something I said previously:

But hey, don’t let me stop you from letting everyone know what you are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. You're really digging your heels in deep to avoid admitting you're part of the problem and there's something you can do about it.

Entitlement and cognitive dissonance and strong forces these days. I'm sorry you can't see past them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Entitlement and cognitive dissonance and strong forces these days. I’m sorry you can’t see past them.

The irony...