this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
264 points (92.0% liked)
YUROP
1630 readers
910 users here now
A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.
Other European communities
Other casual communities:
Language communities
Cities
Countries
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- https://feddit.dk
- [email protected] / [email protected]
- [email protected]
- https://lemmy.eus/
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- https://foros.fediverso.gal/
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Italy: [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Poland: [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Does Germany have some rules that defence spending requires a 2/3rds supermajority or something? Linke and AfD cannot stop anything on their own if a simple majority is required. The Union and SPD have a slim majority between them, and add the Greens and you've got an extremely strong majority.
The only way the conservatives get the funding for increased arms manufacturing is by disabling/changing something about the debt ceiling.
Debt ceiling is in the basic law (constitution), which requires a 2/3 majority to be altered.
Linke are against the debt ceiling in general, but not if it's only disabled for military spending while still preventing investments in public infrastructure. I think with a bit of diplomacy and concessions in the wording, Linke can be persuaded here.
Oh yeah I've heard some commentators talking about the debt brake before, and how some are pushing to do away with it. It didn't occur to me that military spending would specifically be the sticking point there.