FDA scientists have been instructed to avoid using words like "woman," "disabled," and "elderly" in external communications, per a leaked list circulating within the agency.

The directive, reportedly linked to Trump’s executive order against "gender ideology," has caused confusion and concern.

The White House denies most words are banned but confirms restrictions on terms related to gender and diversity.

Scientists fear these limits will hinder medical research and public health efforts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Harbinger01173430 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, so we can use Talking Rib and Cripple instead?

[–] greenfish 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

My friend is a proposal manager for a non-profit. She had to advise some of her scientists to use 'non-man person' for a proposal for a grant to study breast cancer. I wish I were joking

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How this continues to be ok with Americans is beyond me. Change stops on an individual level. Your friend should have called bullshit then and there and refuse to use non-man person. Over 50% of the goddamn population is a non-man person.

[–] atrielienz 2 points 4 hours ago

Distractions. There are a lot of them and most of us are replying to the distractions with emotional messages and Hitler/nazi-musk memes instead of doing our due diligence to find out what's going on and how we can stop it. The memes, they do nothing but give us the sense of camaraderie without direction or objective. And any time you tell the people making them that, they get mad and block you or downvote you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I propose dividing people into penised people and penisless people. I'm sure vagina is banned too but I can't remember