this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
199 points (99.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5808 readers
858 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darthelmet 38 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I wish people wouldn't just resign as a protest. Stay around and do your job terribly. Don't make it easy for them.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The problem is that when you have a direct order to commit a crime, the choice is:

  • resign
  • be fired and escorted out a few minutes later
  • do the crime

Being fired is a few minutes later isn't preferable to resigning, though a few people have.

Stick around and sabotage is something you can do when you're not directly ordered to do something criminal.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

silly take. getting fired is the best outcome then you sue for wrongful termination.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Tradition in the US is to resign. Last time we had a lot like this, Nixon wound up resigning because he didn't think he had the support in Congress to avoid conviction when impeached.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

oh boy do I have a tower in paris to sell you. people are going to have to learn how to say no if they want to get rid of trump lol.

the whole point of these orders are to identify the people who have a back bone and get rid of them. following tradition is literally the worst stance to take in this situation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Not much chance for any others to do much of anything; Trump fired all the other AGs from the Biden era while we were discussing this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

oh? have a linky? that'd be wonderful news. thats a group that interacts with federal judges on the regular.

nm

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nixon wound up resigning because he didn’t think he had the support in Congress to avoid conviction when impeached.

And this part, quite literally is how we got Fox news...

Roger Ailes had said "if we had a friendly media then Nixon would never have had to resign." Now they have their fox, the propaganda flows and keeps Republicans from ever having to face consequences. The lies cover their actions and they never face proper pressure. :(

[–] einlander 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also being fired puts all your benefits at risk. Might as well resign and keep your pension then be fired "for cause" and potentially lose it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I guess e.g. pension entitlements.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doing your job poorly is CIA endorsed antifascist praxis

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Not anymore. If I remember correctly, they just took that manual down off their website.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

That's pretty much every conservative employee during a Democrat's run at office.

Resigning is stupid and what they want so they can replace them faster.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you mean as in civil dissobedience (so that the administration are forced to fire you or accept that you aren't going along with facism) or as in sneak ops sucking at your job to slow things down?

I like both ideas! I'm sure plenty do them as well, but maybe get less attention/coverage than high prifile resignations.

[–] darthelmet 2 points 2 days ago

Mostly the 2nd one. I imagine just refusing openly as an individual will have about as much impact as just resigning, but if you can gum things up a bit? Maybe that adds up. I suppose another alternative is non-individualized refusal: a strike. Same theory as any strike applies: it’d be hard for them to fire all of us at once without shooting themselves in the foot. I suppose in either case though, this only really applies if the gov wants them actively doing something bad rather than just trying to gut the department.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some people who have dignity for themselves, would rather serve their position honorably and be mistaken because they're human. They don't want to do their job poorly that directly violates their own work ethic and the duty they have sworn to uphold.

Resigning in this case is basically saying "I will not be told how to do my job because you don't understand how it works and I will not let you use my job as a means to play political theater".

[–] Sanctus 3 points 2 days ago

"By opening up my position to embed more loyalists who will use it for political theater anyway"