this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
383 points (87.6% liked)

Science Memes

12345 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
383
Entropy? Never heard of it. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
153 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teslasaur 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What power plant? We're talking about powering a carbon capture plant. If you do that with close to zero emission power, what's the downside?

Worst case is that they realize that the carbon capture plant is inefficient and you still have wind power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Right but the carbon capture uses more power to capture the co2 than the power plant uses to produce it. So if you replaced said power plant with renewable energy instead of using three times as much to capture the carbon from the original plant, it would net the same result.

Essentially carbon capture makes no sense until you’re at the point that carbon capture requires less energy to capture carbon than to produce it