this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
507 points (99.2% liked)

politics

20280 readers
4285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Interestingly, unlike cases where publication like this was in the public interest, as with Reality Winner, Elon Musk has yet to be arrested.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 160 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is how you know the current administration is wholly corrupt: Even when Elon Musk does blatantly illegal things, the DoJ won't prosecute him. Trump doesn't care that this is illegal.

It is so stupid that the prosecution of federal crimes can be politically co-opted like this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Prosecution for leaking of classified information is complicated.

Because... the inherent act of doing so confirms that something was classified information. Instead they are either talked to behind the scenes or they get black helicoptered.

There is also the argument that the POTUS is the be all end all of what is and is not classified and since musk is basically the POTUS. Optimally there is paperwork associated with this but it gets into one of those wonderful "gentleman's agreement" grey zones.

That is why you'll never see someone get charges filed against them for admitting that nixon was actually killed by aliens from Rygel 7 and replaced with an android. Instead they will just

[–] [email protected] 57 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is a fantasy. People get charged for leaking classified information all the time. It's just a crime, not a spy thriller.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They will just what

THEY WILL JUST WHAT?

Blink twice if you're ok!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bro got abducted by government aliens

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Can you hear a helicopter ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

the inherent act of doing so confirms that something was classified information.

Does it? You can investigate to verify if there was a "leak" - aka some communication happened, and if it did, whether it was classified or just a dick pic

[–] Placebonickname 4 points 4 days ago

We should allow any 1 of the 50 states prosecute the federal gov. Its the only way to balance stuff out if the President is the person making all the appointments