this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
731 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

13430 readers
2341 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Headline is kind of clickbait

The bill also allows for the flying of a “historic version of a flag ... that is temporarily displayed for educational purposes,”

“There are instances where in classrooms, you have curriculum that is needed to use flags such as World War II, Civil War,” he said. “You may have a Nazi flag. You may have a Confederate flag, and so you are allowed to display those flags… as part of the curriculum, and that is okay.”

The law is still dumb for wanting to ban the pride flag.

[–] Placebonickname 27 points 1 day ago

I would just show the kids a picture of the flag in the book and if they don’t understand why some Americans are objecting to the flying of a Nazi flag. Maybe they should read the damn book. 

[–] dantheclamman 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I had a teacher put a Confederate flag in our classroom 'for history'. She also spent the entire weeks-long Civil War module drilling into our young minds that the war was about States' rights, not slavery.

[–] Placebonickname 9 points 1 day ago

This was a popular thing when I was young, and yes there was a debate over what state laws/federal laws wanted, but Kansas has a very interesting history - were runaway slaves left Missouri and headed into Lawrence and people of Missouri took the law into their own hands to hunt down fugitive- runaway slaves, sometimes because they just wanted the bounty or the reward.

In one incident, the sheriff from a city in Missouri was shot at and as a response people from Missouri Road into Lawrence and burnt down most of the big buildings and killed a couple of people and stole several horses. This was known as the border war and it occurred far before 1861. It was all about racism, hatred, and money, and it had absolutely nothing to do with state rights 

[–] 13roses 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Yep, it was about the north fighting for their right not NOT participate in slavery, as the south tried to force slavery upon them (fugitive slave act), then seceded from the US and attacked it.

It was the war of southern aggression.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the flag was the least of the problems here.

[–] dantheclamman 2 points 21 hours ago

The flag was a (partially) red flag

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How would a pride flag not be a part of history unless you are openly admitting to altering history

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You do make a good point.

Although the idea that the 80s is being taught in history classes makes me feel old.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 4 points 21 hours ago

Greenday plays on the classic rock station, the 80s is practically ancient history, haha /s and now crying