this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3352 readers
136 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HexesofVexes 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Laughs in absolutely decimated university sector

We've known this one for years. How to increase teaching staff workload:

1). Hire 3 people to do 2.8 people's jobs.

2). Make a huge fuss and convince 2 of those people they are doing more than the third.

3). Fire one person, and reduce workload slightly.

4). End up with 2 people doing 2.6 people's jobs.

Repeat as needed to drive your talented teaching staff into the ground.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There’s a primary and secondary element to this: fast elevating grifter-types who are thrilled with “managing” others out of the classroom (especially if they’re not good teachers) and awarding them excessively large salaries. £300-500k plus a chauffeur anyone for parading round in a suit and making the “big decisions” like employing cheap non-qualifieds.

I’ll eat my hat if I see any of the senior managers of academies and MATs being made redundant.

[–] HexesofVexes 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh but senior management are essential! It's not as if their poor decision making led us to... Oh...

On a more serious note, unions are an educator's best friend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I was an active member of NUT until I found out that our local rep had his salary paid by the LEA in a deal with the union. He helped shut our school and refused to carry out collective bargaining even when we voted unanimously. He “advised” LEA in how to deal with staff. When we complained to the union, they refused to listen. Left with the impression this sort of thing happened a lot. Didn’t renew my membership and wouldn’t ever rejoin.

[–] tankplanker 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Implementation of trusts and the SLT aggrandisement this has caused is a huge area of potential cost savings and morale boosting for front-line staff by scrapping it.

The idea of empowering schools via trusts was a decent one, but the implementation is absolutely woeful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I’ll be surprised if Labour do anything to challenge anything about MATs and the crooks who run them. Take a look at the “experts” involved in the curriculum review - all pro-academisation and many of them already raking in the cash as either CEOs or advisors to MATs. I think parents would be genuinely shocked if they knew the extent of the (for want of a better word) corruption in education. Like all aspects of governing a modern state, politcians don’t want to actually manage anything and are quite happy to let the grifters do it for them.