this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
489 points (94.9% liked)

Comics

5826 readers
691 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Number 1, the reason Communists don't put too much stock into how Communism will function is because we believe it has to be built towards. We can only speculate. That being said...

In Communism, there's no such thing as profit. Commodity production for exchange-value doesn't exist. There is only production for Use-Value. There's no need for a "profit redistribution" arm of anything, the administration will likely have different ministries like Ministry of Education, etc but there's no need for these individual redistributors. There will be managers, planners, "accountants," and more.

I think you'd do well to investigate how AES, countries trying to build towards Communism, function in reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I meant profit of Use-Value.

I already asked you this question before, but you did not answer it, and I remember you were the one to use the word "profit" (in quotes) when talking about Communism for this same reason (I did notice).

How do you ensure the ones who work the hardest get the most Use-Value of the community "profit"?

Or do we no longer care about unfair redistribution of goods / services / food / water / housing / etc ?

Is it only under "private ownership" where we need to make sure we give more value to the ones who work the hardest? is it not unfair if someone who works the least gets more than someone who works the most? what about someone who happens to be friend with the one distributing housing?

... And with this I go to bed, it's late here... thanks for the discussion!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It depends on the phase in Communism. In lower phases, Labor Vouchers (centrally administered and destroyed on first use) would likely be used to for goods and services that aren't essential, essentials would be free. Rates of Labor Vouchers would be based on hours worked, with more for higher skilled or more intense labor, and the same vouchers payed for less time worked in more strenuous or dangerous conditions. In higher phases, it likely wouldn't matter, productivity would be high enough for the mantra "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs."

You can read more on economic planning, but again, please research AES to see how these countries are already attempting to work towards such a system.