Casual Conversation

2078 readers

581 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Can parents please explain to me this situation? (self.casualconversation)

submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by Grogon to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey, I might be in the wrong here because I am not a parent and won't have kids.

My nephew turned 6 and I wanted to buy him the new switch whenever it comes out. Brother told me he doesn't want that and thinks it's too dangerous and overall screen time is very bad for children. I understand what he means but can't that be regulated with lets say 1-2 hours per day limits?

What I also don't understand and this is a personal arguement between my brother and me is following: When I turned 5 years old in 1996 my father bought us a N64 and we were playing golden eye, donkey kong etc. on splitscreen all day and night and had a blast. All our friends were at our place and most people had a N64 or Sega or whatever console.

And yes we went outside and had fun and were creative. We copied a few games like golden eye with our water guns or other games like Super Mario 64. At home when our parents went to bed we sneaked out of our beds to the living room and started playing golden eye and other games all night long.

But I understand him and respect him, I won't buy it and I will save my money. I just don't understand why most parents nowadays are so extreme. I am 100% on limiting time and nowdays it's got to be easier than back then to just set a 1-2 hour limit on consoles. I am no friend of buying phones for kids at age 3 or 4 or sitting them in front of a screen so they are quiet. I understand all that. But I don't understand all the harsh choices most people make with being strikt and going complete against stuff.

If I had a kid I think I'd give it a Nintendo to because I think it can be good for fine motor skills and in the future we will be in front of screens even more than now. It's not great and not ideal but it is what it is and I think kids should learn early how to use consoles, phones, etc. in a positive way (limited time, under supervision)

As of now my nephew never touched a phone. This isn't anything bad but compared to his class mates I think this is weird. Imagine when he is in school and his friends tell him to scroll and he has no idea how to even scroll? Isn't that weird?

I don't know what they are doing with my nephew it's hilarious cause he can't even hold scissors and he is 6 years old. If he can't use screens, phones etc. I was expecting atleast him to be able to cut a straight line??

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

Get him an N64 and GoldenEye?