this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)
Space
9197 readers
99 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Laymen knowledge here. My guess on the limitation is either on the targeting abilities of both nodes being able to get absolutely perfectly aligned down to a mm across stellar distances for maximum amount of light emitted by the sending laser to the optical receiving satellite OR a lens on the sending laser that spreads the laser light beam out a bit so alignment doesn't have to be as precise.
The cost to the beam spreading is that there are fewer photons per square mm to impact the optical receiver. So in this case the receiving satellite only has to be within a 500m cone to receive the signal, but thats at a distance of 40,000km. 40,000km is chump change in solar system or stellar distances, so that cone of light would be dramatically larger if the satellite was farther away, which means dramatically fewer photons to receive.