this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
654 points (93.4% liked)

Political Memes

5926 readers
3481 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

no dairy cow would survive 20 years without shelter from the elements, protection from predators, veterinary care, ample food, and clean water. That's not a natural lifespan. That's an artificial lifespan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kind of a moot point since dairy cows, like the majority of animals raised for food, are man-made breeds and wouldn't exist in the wild anyway. But you knew I meant when I said natural lifespan, as in how long they'd live if they weren't killed as juveniles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so you knew you were spreading misinformation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've actually been quite clear in the definition of life span I'm using. You appear to be intentionally misunderstanding my point.

The limits of the life span of each species appear to be determined ultimately by heredity. Locked within the code of the genetic material are instructions that specify the age beyond which a species cannot live given even the most favourable conditions.

https://www.britannica.com/science/life-span

Can you at least be consistent in your argument? On the one hand, you say that a species' lifespan in captivity can't be an indicator of their natural lifespan, because they wouldn't survive as long in the wild. On the other hand, you say that a livestock species' lifespan is dictated by when humans choose to slaughter them. Can you explain how these arguments don't contradict each other?

I'm happy to engage in a good faith conversation with you on this if you're interested.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't care to get bogged down in a semantic argument with an ideologue. I've said what I wanted to say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Likewise, have a great day.

[–] PetteriSkaffari 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Anyhow, livestock is being killed well before they reach maturity. All for human pleasure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

pretty sure most livestock are slaughtered for money.

[–] PetteriSkaffari 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Money is quite pleasurable, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

personally I fucking hate money, which is probably why I don't have any