this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
158 points (97.0% liked)

PC Gaming

9110 readers
1243 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 days ago (33 children)

Graphics cards will be the least of your worries. Putting tariffs on chips will crash the economy, there's no way anyone will let him do this.

[–] Seleni 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They want the economy to crash.

One side because they like to crash businesses and then walk away with all the money, and they figure a country is no different.

And the other side will let them, because they want people to stop playing those degenerate evil video games. That it does great damage to the country is simply a just punishment for allowing such degeneracy in the first place, in their minds.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wrong kind of crash and video games aren’t what’s being affected here. It’s cars, ai, defence contracts, Israel

There’s no way it would go through unless Trump is replacing Taiwan with China like he does with other targeted tariffs

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The amount of people who don't know how pervasive computer chips are; is only slightly above the amount of people who support trump.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Which is insane because it was all over the news just a couple years ago about why vehicle prices had gotten so high... Because of a chip shortage.

[–] Seleni 1 points 2 days ago

I’m just saying that’s what they think. Of course it’s going to fuck everything else over, but the people supporting this in the hallowed halls of congress seem to be in one of two camps lately.

[–] Jesus_666 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Crashing the economy lets them buy companies for cheap so they'll concentrate even more wealth onto themselves when the economy rebounds.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hitting the tech sector harder than everything else will remove their ability to leverage their own tech businesses to buy up others.

[–] Jesus_666 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Depends on how much of their money is liquid or in non-tech assets. It doesn't matter that the tech sector gets hit the hardest if they're certain that they can get it to bounce back by the time they've bought out companies in other sectors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The answer to that is very little of it. Their networth is due to their ownership of these stocks. If the value of these stocks dip more than others (and due to the AI craze, they are more inflated than even other tech stocks), they lose collateral to borrow against (this is how musk bought Twitter).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Consumer graphics is a tiny fraction. The real buyers are enterprise datacenters and super computers. El captian at the Lawrence Livermore national lab alone has 43,000 apus.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All it would do is force people to keep their very much still capable last gen computers lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There are chips in nearly every single appliance you own at this point. From your car to your toaster.

[–] pivot_root 1 points 2 days ago

I read "car" as "cat"... and that would still be correct sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Sorry - all it would do in regards to “countering the threat of gaming”

load more comments (28 replies)