this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
688 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19616 readers
3731 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"If the purges [of potential voters], challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast."

"[...] Democracy can win* despite the 2.3% suppression headwind.

And that’s our job as Americans: to end the purges, the vigilante challenges, the ballot rejections and the attitude that this is all somehow OK."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is a very hard question.

Just based on my experience, as I'm originally from a country that was going through, is still going through its Trump phase, it doesn't matter. They will only get out of the way if they are forced to, and time and again they proved they are against third party candidates more than Republicans, and vice versa in fact, the Reps will hit you harder than the Dems if they see you usurping them. This is just as it was in my home as well. No enterprise to "force the Dems to quit" will work because the entire system will work against you.

The only way to break this that I've seen work is that people should join small local mutual aid groups, which are political in nature, but not partisan in the sense of being beholden to the big two. Like the DSA in the US I guess? And wait for the opportunity while helping others and sabotaging the worst excesses of the government.

Or do a revolution I guess, because contrary to what everyone says everywhere, some of them do in fact succeed in creating a better society. Even when they fail. Revolutions got rid of the divine right of kings, not "moderation and slow progress", and revolution got rid of dictators like Ceaucescu as well.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only way to break this that I’ve seen work is that people should join small local mutual aid groups

How do we get from "small mutual aid groups" to "fix the genocidal two party system?" If the answer is incrementalism, it is no answer. Incrementalism got us here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Radical change on the local level. Instead of trying to turn whole states by increment, turn towns and districts radically. Subvert federal decisions locally, and if you provide a schema for others to follow.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm still not seeing how working for my local food bank (the nearest pin on the map when I look up mutual aid. Next closest one is like 4 hours away) is going to get anywhere towards changing the bipartisan pro-genocide hegemony.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

You can help people, shield then from government overreach and change their minds by talking to them instead of just shouting into a megacorp-censored online void.

That's how the consies get people as well, churches being one of the last places you can socialise and discuss civics.

It will of course take a lot of people doing this, but that's how organising people works. The alternative is doing a Luigi, but that has dire personal consequences.