World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
I think that the state having the authority to kill people is bad, actually.
Even pedophiles?
It is not the severity of the crimes but the risk of executing innocents. A person could be a convicted pedophile but new evidence might reveal that they were innocent.
So you're okay with imprisoning potentially innocent people for life?
So you're okay with murdering innocent people?
Well there have been life sentance that have been vacated when new evidence, generally DNA, has come to light proving they were not the culprit. That wouldn't be possible if they were dead, delayed justice is better than no justice.
Who knows what sort of technological advances we may get in the next 50 years that could free people imprisoned today? Why would we remove the possibility? It's cheaper to house an inmate for a lifetime than the process of execution so what's the practical reason to have I act state sanctioned murder?
Revenge? Idk. That doesn't sound like justice to me.
There have also been life sentences where innocent people die before they're exonerated.
Also, losing decades of your life for something you didn't do isn't any more acceptable because you have the potential of going free if you're proven innocent.
All you people are saying is you're cool with imprisoning potentially innocent people for life, which completely nullifies your argument of avoiding the death penalty because "they may be innocent."
Enough with the BS now. Only someone who is alive can be exonerated.
You need to improve your reading comprehension.
You are pro capital punishment, yes?
So.... we might as well kill anyways?
At this point, I just have to assume you're a troll.
No, so your argument about not punishing the innocent doesn't hold any water.
If you're against the death penalty because they might be innocent, then you should also be against any long-term prison sentence because they might be innocent.
Yeah, no. I'm just saying things you don't like. Blocked.
Well that is a super crazy leap.
But okay. Block me. You're a deeply unserious person saying silly things so I'm gonna call this a win. 😂
Ofcourse! A convicted pedophile is a convicted pedophile until proven innocent.
With a life sentence you can at least get some of your life back if proven innocent. With the death penalty not so much.
So you're cool with imprisoning potentially innocent people for life, but giving them the death penalty is too much?
Yeah, but what about those who die in prison before they're proven innocent? What about those that spend decades in prison and have basically nothing to live for when they get out? What about those who lose realistically any of their time due to an innocent conviction?
All of those are acceptable to do to innocent people in your eyes?
Lol, funny how you're all of a sudden putting faith in the verdict when the death penalty isn't on the line.
You a Jordan Peterson guy?
Not sure who that is. I don't keep up with celebrities like you people do.
Who people?
The average person on these forums.
Nah... 🐕🦺😗