this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
454 points (97.9% liked)

News

24048 readers
4977 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MunkysUnkEnz0 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Probably made a deal and wants all his Bitcoin. Smart kid, you know it's hidden somewhere. Thank God he's out there double life without parole. It's inhumane.

Not to mention that undercover basically set him up to look bad.

[–] LengAwaits 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he didn't wanna look bad he shouldn't have sent a person he believed to be a hitman $300,000 to murder someone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He was never charged or convicted of those charges, he's innocent of that.

[–] LengAwaits 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Well, you're half correct. He was charged in Maryland for attempted witness murder, but the charges were dropped once he'd been sentenced so harshly in New York. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, and there's plenty of conspiratorial debate about them.

I strongly doubt that the prosecution would have brought the charges if they didn't have traceable evidence (through blockchain transaction records, undercover police chat logs, and data seizure) that coins, sent to an undercover agent for the purposes of murder, originated from wallets that were owned by Ulbricht. You can read more about one of the employees Ulbricht allegedly tried to have murdered (Curtis Green, who was sentenced for his own crimes) here and here.

You're right, though, he's technically innocent as the charges were dismissed. Perhaps it was all a huge setup/honeypot but the truth of whether or not he sent the coins should be discoverable with enough due diligence scouring the blockchain records. Intent matters, even though it didn't end up getting tried in this instance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

You're right, I should've said never convicted. There's a ton of conspiracies around it all, was he actually the first Dread Pirate Roberts or was it actually a title passed down? At the time everyone was saying parallel construction but in hindsight he was probably just sloppy. It was a really exciting time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

How was he set up to look bad?

[–] paraphrand 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People can watch his wallets right? And they suspect/know what ones they are? And this is something people are hotly following now?

I should look this up. It’s fascinating if we can just watch it happen, on the chain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't watch Monero. Which is what he should have been using instead of Bitcoin.

[–] NikkiDimes 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, he really should have set that up before he went to prison, you know, before Monero existed, lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. But Bitcoin didn't suddenly become transparent the moment Monero was created.

[–] NikkiDimes 3 points 23 hours ago

Uh...okay then?