this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17957 readers
269 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been thinking about how we could potentially enhance the Lemmy experience, and I wonder if anyone else sees potential in incorporating a feature similar to Bluesky's Custom Feeds or Mastodon's Fedialgo?

Here's my thought process:

Why Custom Feeds?

  1. User Empowerment: Custom feeds allow users to tailor their experience, moving beyond the limitations of chronological or "popular" sorting.

  2. Discovery: They can help users find content and communities they might not encounter otherwise.

  3. Flexibility: Users could create feeds based on specific interests, keywords, or even complex criteria.


Bluesky's Approach

Bluesky's implementation of Custom Feeds is particularly interesting:

  • Users can create and share their own algorithm-driven feeds
  • It promotes algorithmic transparency and user choice
  • The feature has been well-received for its innovative approach to content curation

https://bsky.social/about/blog/7-27-2023-custom-feeds

https://bsky.social/about/blog/3-30-2023-algorithmic-choice

https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/26/23739174/bluesky-custom-feeds-algorithms-twitter-alternative


Mastodon's Fedialgo

Alternatively, we could look at Fedialgo, which:

  • Allows for custom feed creation within the Mastodon ecosystem
  • Is open-source and federated, aligning well with Lemmy's principles

https://github.com/ronilaukkarinen/fedialgo


Potential Implementation for Lemmy

  1. User-Created Algorithms: Allow users to define their own feed algorithms using a simple interface.

  2. Shareable Feeds: Enable users to share their custom feeds, fostering community curation.

  3. Integration with Lemmy's Existing Features: Ensure the custom feeds work well with Lemmy's communities and cross-instance functionality.

  4. Open-Source Approach: Keep the feature open-source and possibly federated, in line with Lemmy's ethos.


I, unfortunately, do not have the time, energy, or knowledge to be able to attempt something like this.


What do you all think?

Could this be a valuable addition to Lemmy?

I'd love to hear your thoughts, concerns, or ideas for potential implementation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I would really appreciate a "meta" feed and a "hobby communities" feed

Also being able to have memes split from the rest