Rejecting causality IS the rational reason. It is you who is irrational. When one scientist brings forth a claim that breaks ALL of physics, with ZERO empirical evidence support such an astounding theory, it is not the ones who doubt that are likely to be wrong.

[–] Tedesche 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It read to me like they provided a reason for denying causality though: that the associative breakdown in entropic state suggests causality can be violated. I don’t have the expertise to evaluate that claim, but if you do, why don’t you just explain to me why it’s wrong? Or is that demanding too much of a random person on the internet?

[–] eran_morad -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uh, because the entire field of physics is completely fucked if causality is violable? I'm really done with you.

[–] Tedesche 3 points 1 week ago

That’s good, because I’m pretty sick of you too. What an arrogant POS.