this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
143 points (87.8% liked)

politics

19631 readers
3816 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks 35 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I saw a couple heavily down voted articles that said that was the largest issue and around 30% of people who voted Biden 2020 but didn't vote 2024 gave that as their reason.

It's fucking insane so many people immediately started denying that was the biggest issue

[–] lennybird 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The stupidity is with these fools thinking Trump would be better for Palestinians.

If it wasn't obvious with Trump moving the embassy to Jeruselum and telling Bibi to, "Finish the job" while privately meeting with Bibi to likely stall a ceasefire agreement pre-election to make Democrats look back, Trump definitely is fully enabling of said Genocide, likely making it worse (eg, you think he would've pressed for a humanitarian aid route into Gaza? FUCK no.)

So then the logical thing to say in an inevitable binary-choice election is: "if Trump and Biden/Harris are equally bad on Israel/Palestine policy (they're not), is Biden/Harris better on other issues, notably domestically, like oh I don't know women's rights and climate change?" You bet your ass.

Hence why couch sitters and Stein voters piss me off far more than Trump supporters, themselves; for they should know better. Yet they fell for the online astroturfing disinfo wars. Drank the Russian vodka.


Edit: The user below keeps curiously deflecting, so I'll just cut to the chase by going above:

Genocide (a) has a spectrum of severity and is not a boolean function, while (b) Gaza isn’t the only place an attempted Genocide is currently being carried out; Ukraine is another place — and it is abundantly clear that both Biden and Harris were better than the Putin-sympathizing puppet that is Trump. So if you didn't vote, worked against Harris, voted Stein, etc. then YOU, too, are complicit with blood on your hands of WORSENING not one but TWO genocides.

[–] DicJacobus 1 points 1 week ago

yeah no. If people seriously abstained from a vote because of Israel and Palestine, and that abstention allowed Trump to win, then the democratic voters deserve to never win an election ever again.

I still believe 2016 was the most important election of our lifetimes, but this one is was a close second, World War III is basically in its pre-game show. and this is how people voted. Just kill me now. ffs

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uh... Trump actually did something about Gaza so it seems the Gaza protest non-voters got what they wanted.

[–] lennybird 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your fallacies are:

  • Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
  • Begging the Question / Circular reasoning

Try not to construct your beliefs atop a flimsy house of cards.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can I have that in English? In case you're saying what I think you're saying, you should read [this>(https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/15/a-stern-message-how-return-of-trump-loomed-over-gaza-ceasefire-negotiations).

[–] lennybird 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm still chuckling that people are trusting anonymous Arabian sources and not recognizing this for the obvious political theatrics it is. (Hint: this is the Circular Reasoning fallacy part, where one has yet to prove the original premise before leaping to illogical conclusions).

I mean, really, do you think he's this TOUGH NEGOTIATOR after all these years and not a complete Reality TV star phony playing games of optics with Bibi behind closed doors? Hahahahahaha!

The ceasefire hardly even matters anymore. The vast majority of civilian deaths have already occurred and Gaza is nothing but razed ruins and rubble. Trump told Bibi to "Finish the job" with Gaza, and Bibi basically did just that.

[–] hypna 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Big? Sure. Biggest? No. Biggest was "the economy". It's practically a law of nature that inflation ends governments.

[–] givesomefucks 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, it beat the economy.

I'll try to find it

Edit:

According to the poll, 29% of that voter group said "ending Israel's violence in Gaza" was the "most important issue" for them in the election.

Gaza was followed by the economy (24%), medicare and society security (12%), immigration and border security (11%), healthcare (10%) and abortion policy (9%).

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-poll-shows-gaza-conflict-a-key-factor-in-kamala-harris-defeat-after-ceasefire-deal/ar-AA1xjvCn

[–] hypna 4 points 1 week ago

I wasn't thinking so specifically about Biden voters who stayed home in 24. I see that's what you were talking about initially.

If you simply ask everyone who voted for Trump, the economy was the top issue. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/11/13/what-trump-supporters-believe-and-expect/

That's all I was saying. But there are, I think, three groups which it would be interesting to have this answer for. The first is the one you mentioned. The other two are people who voted for Biden and switched to Trump, and people who chose not to vote in 2020 and voted for Trump in '24. I couldn't find those answers readily.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

are you noticing that your comment regarding the yougov poll stating this fact is getting more engagement than any of the other comments and are you also noticing that they're all refuting it?

[–] givesomefucks 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, but I block alot of people who refuse to address how to gain voters back and just want to screech at them (even tho they'll never see/hear it).

It makes social media a lot better and I highly recommend it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It makes social media a lot better and I highly recommend it.

my neurodivergence has forced me to develop a tolerance to shitty people, so i know i can handle a lot of toxicity; that why i'm still commenting here.

i say this because it's also afforded me the experience of knowing that neurotypicals can only handle so much toxicity before they give-up/check-out/take-a-vacation and i hope you don't fall into the same pattern; there's already too few sane people on .world and your departure would make it much worse than that of of your follow .worlder.