this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
132 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

60546 readers
6901 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi -4 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Unanimous?! Makes you wonder what they know that we might not.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Nothing to do with the data collection, the court was ruling on the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act's constitutionality.

[–] jacksilver 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's more there is a precedence of the government blocking software they think is a threat - https://cmmcinfo.org/list-of-hardware-software-and-services-banned-by-us-government/

We give the government a lot of leeway when it comes to "national security"

Also, we're not the first country to ban it - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/heres-what-happened-when-india-banned-tiktok

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes boldly following in the liberatory footsteps of India.

[–] jacksilver 1 points 8 hours ago

Wasn't claiming it was a good or bad call, just that the Supreme Court is about legality and there is history of the US banning software and a global history of banning this specific app.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Imagine believing these wacky old farts know anything at all about the internet.

[–] Zak 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Most of them[1] know a whole lot more about constitutional law than the average lemming.

When things are working correctly, the Supreme Court's role is usually not very concerned with the facts of the case; its role is to resolve questions of law. Congress considered the facts including some classified briefings, decided that American app stores should be forbidden from distributing TikTok to American users, and made a law. The court was asked whether Congress has the authority to make laws like that, and the court decided that it does.

[1] Maybe not Clarence Thomas