politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Nah, miss me with that shit. I don't want a communist revolution. I want to have options besides voting for Republican Party 1 or Republican Party 2. That's the strategy that the DNC has settled on, and I hope that it fucking blows up in their face as long as they embrace it. It's a bullshit strategy that isn't supported by data (but is supported by big donors, so I guess it's cool to lose as long as the ca$h keeps coming), and everyone loses in the long run. Democrats being yesteryear republicans isn't better, it's just the same bullshit on a longer fuse.
I mean that is fine but I still find I like some improvement over going backwards and I very much doubt any replacement is going to somehow be way better. I really feel people want a magic answer. Progress is not easy or sudden. It requires going for the best as often as possible. You and I disagree a lot though and see things differently. I still can't believe what biden got done in one term in one of the worst conditions a democratic presidency has had as far as the rest of the government was. He still ranks as the best one I have experienced in my lifetime as far as what he had to deal with. For me basically biden then obama then clinton then carter then bush senior then reagan then bush junior then trump. I just do not believe the dems will blow up and be replaced by something we have never seen historically. Now I can believe that the republicans could blow up and revert back to the way they were back before the 80's and in turn that would force the democrats to go more left to distance themselves from what the republicans do. The problem to me is your trying to blow up the wrong party. Get rid of the most rotted out pieces and replace and eventually the bridge will be decent. Don't replace the least worn pieces first and work your way to the worst.
I don't think we disagree as much as you think we do, tbh. I mean, sure, if I could wave a wand and make the GOP implode, I'd do it without a second thought, but I can't. I don't want to vote for the GOP or their policies, and I don't want to see them succeed. That's why it's so frustrating to see the DNC deciding that instead of offering a meaningful alternative for people to go and vote for, they're just going to, against all reason and evidence, consider their base locked in and try to court moderate Republicans instead. They're both shuffling to the right AND giving away elections by doing that. This last election, Kamala flipped 1% of Republicans. Joe flipped 5%. They might as well be vying for the Sasquatch vote. It seems to me like it'd be much better to try and give the huge swaths of no-votes a reason to show up to the polls.
I don't think they are vying for republicans at all. Its just they are a centerist party. A stability party. So they are gradual and more traditional in their methods. The problem that I see is that they end up having to spend half their time just repairing things which makes it hard to progress. The democratic party has primaries and we are deciding the canidate for our locality. People don't have to wait for folks to come to their door for signature. They can find someone they like getting signatures or run themselves. Money is an issue with elections but that is something that will not go away if the democrats go away and its always going to be something we will have to contend with.