this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
806 points (99.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2153 readers
1212 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A breast cancer surgeon had to "scrub out mid-surgery" to call a UnitedHealthcare representative because the insurance giant questioned whether the procedure she was in the middle of performing was really necessary.

Dr. Elisabeth Potter posted her story to Instagram this week, and the post has gotten more than 221,000 likes.

Still wearing her scrub cap, Dr. Potter began her video saying, "It’s 2025, and navigating insurance has somehow just gotten worse."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] candybrie 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the current scenario, they have to pay nothing if they kill you. It's just pure savings. In the other, they have to pay $200k.

[–] Chip_Rat 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's true but it's a business. Yes they would prefer to pay nothing but if the law passed they had to cover life insurance then they straight up have a number to beat. If it's gonna cost $200,001 to keep you alive then nope, denied.

[–] webadict 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your logic is true, but what you're forgetting is that they already have a number to beat, and it's $0.

[–] cashew 6 points 2 weeks ago

Technically the number is person's insurance premium over expected natural lifespan. But that number is still going to be lower than medical expenses. Might as well be $0.

[–] candybrie 6 points 2 weeks ago

And they currently just deny everything and hope you don't appeal.