this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
483 points (99.6% liked)

News

24746 readers
4641 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. Justice Department, joined by 10 states, has sued six major landlords and RealPage, a company behind a rent-setting algorithm, accusing them of colluding to keep rents high by sharing sensitive pricing data and avoiding competition.

The landlords, operating over 1.3 million units, allegedly used RealPage's algorithm and coordination to align rents, exacerbating the housing crisis.

One landlord has agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.

Critics argue this scheme worsens affordability issues for renters, who already face record rent burdens amid a strained housing market.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatakuNox 18 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Oh sweet summer child.

There is no ceiling! If 10 of us poors need to cram into a studio apartment to make ends meet, what does the landlord and corporations care? The justice department is already suing (until the 20th) the largest rental companies for collusion and price fixing. They are using algorithms to decide their occupancy rates. Turns out 100% occupancy isn't the most profitable. They need constant turn over in order to keep rasing rates. People have to live somewhere and if all the companies are using the same algorithm isn't obvious that 100% occupancy isn't wise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I understand that, but at some point they will hit a number where people in the area can't afford the 1st month (or more) down or even monthly payments. And landlords aren't going to just start waiving the down payment or rent up front as this whole thing is about them using algorithms to maximize income. So there is a ceiling, but they can of course collude on what that is and all match that ceiling so that it's the only option (which I assume is what happened here). If they can then cause turnover once tenants are in place by prices breaking that ceiling they can keep down payments for breaking lease, then drop the price back to that ceiling for the next victim, rinse and repeat.

[–] marron12 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I understand that, but at some point they will hit a number where people in the area can’t afford the 1st month (or more) down or even monthly payments.

I lived in a place where that happened. There were very obvious changes as the rent kept going up. (I stayed because everywhere else was going up just as much.)

  • Long-term tenants moved out.
  • A lot more one bedrooms had roommates.
  • People had less furniture. Sometimes just a mattress on the floor and a plastic chair.
  • A lot more three-day notices and eviction notices on people's doors.
  • Some apartments turned into Airbnbs.
  • One apartment turned, very not surreptitiously, into a "massage" place.
  • More and more units stayed empty for months.

None of that stopped the rent from going up. If anything, it went up faster.

[–] NatakuNox 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People think too small when it comes to stuff like this. One individual land lord company doing this isn't a big deal. But when you scale that up to a national level? We're talking about millions of homes going empty, misused, and siphoned off for only greed.

[–] marron12 1 points 1 month ago

I'd say even one landlord is too many, but easier to deal with. The scale this seems to be happening at is mind boggling and should be criminal, in my opinion. Or whatever it takes to stop this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)