this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
246 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19609 readers
4704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) faced backlash online after claiming, without evidence, that Democrats might attempt to “steal” the certification of Donald Trump as president.

Her remarks, posted on social media, drew criticism as overly dramatic and unnecessary, especially given the routine nature of the certification process, which proceeded without incident.

The comments came on the anniversary of the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, leading many to contrast the peaceful proceedings with past unrest.

Critics dismissed her rhetoric as attention-seeking and partisan posturing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lath -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's completely fine. No need for anyone to understand every comment made.


If you're curious, i will attempt to explain. If you're not, stop reading here. I have yet to fully forget where I was going with this. Tomorrow would have been different.

Let's take it from the end "biggest asshole in the room 24x7".

So the planet is akin to one bit room we all have to share. It has limited resources and so not everyone can be accommodated. Conflict of interest happen all the time where two or more groups need a consumable resource that has an insufficient quantity to satisfy everyone's needs. At that point, a choice will be made on who gets to consume those resources and regardless of fairness, those that are left out will feel resentful. Those that have to make that choice or gain those resources will be assholes to the victims that are left out. Can't prevent that.

So there will always be an "asshole in the room". And as long as there is at least one, then having a "biggest asshole in the room" is also unavoidable.

We'll keep the "24/7" for later. Now we move to the front of the comment, "treat maga with compassion".

Regardless of maga or another group, there's a conflict of interest at every level of society. You can't escape it as long as two different entities compete for the same thing. As emotional creatures, resentment will without a doubt influence us in thought and action. Anyone saying otherwise is blind to their own emotional state.

So the "biggest asshole in the room 24x7" draws away attention from all the other "assholes in the room". But all the other assholes aren't just the big ones, it's everyone that has to choose who gets something and who gets nothing. Every manager at every level in every aspect of society is an asshole to those who aren't given what they need even though they're just handling the limited resources made available to them.

There will always be a "biggest asshole in the room", no matter how small an asshole they may be, if at all, because as long as someone is in the room, they're the "biggest asshole" by default.

That's why maga should be treated with compassion. They unwittingly sacrifice themselves or are intentionally sacrificed and attract the greatest ire, allowing all others to escape the same level of reprisal, earned or not.

Yes, they're dumb, they're being used, leopards ate their face. But that's life. They don't have an exclusive monopoly on this. It happens with or without them. So why not have some compassion and pity? They don't seem to have any for others. Yet why do some seem desperate to emulate that sort of behaviour? I thought that's what people hated about them in the first place?

Unless I misunderstood the comment and this was actually about replacing them... In which case, I apologize.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I frankly don't know if we agree or not, and I'm not even sure you replied to what I was trying to communicate, but I wanted to acknowledge the effort you put into your reply and the ensuing comment chain. I'll read it again later.

[–] lath 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks.

You might not get it the second time either, but that's ok. It's just some comments thought up on the fly, not a thesis that needs defending.