this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
924 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

60303 readers
5585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump's inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 days ago (9 children)

As a Bi man there is something that particularly stings about a well known, openly gay CEO funding a man who is hateful towards LGBTQ+ people. I never really liked him nor apple but it is an extra fuck you.

Being rich is ultimately the disease as it compels him to appeal to power but I hope the last things hears is "Told you I would kill you last".

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

His in-group is not LGBTQIA+, it is other rich people. The same is true for all of them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

The wealthy all seem to understand that class solidarity is more important than any other issue. Why is it taking so long for everyone else to figure that out?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

There are no real allies in the oligarch class. Temporal alliances or common goals at best. They will (and do) kill for a penny.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Hands down, the most effective punishments for these people at the top is to redistribute their wealth so they have to live like everyone else.

That is legitimately a fate worse than death in their eyes, which should put things into perspective for the rest of us.

[–] andros_rex 7 points 3 days ago

Peter Thiel is also a gay man, and pulling a lot of these strings behind the scenes.

It’s oligarchy. Thiel can fuck who ever he wants (and make them disappear when he’s done…) while maintaining political power by sacrificing queer people to the Hour of Hate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Sam Altman, too

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Tim cook will never suffer the consequences of anti-gay legislation or the lack of legal protection for gay people.

Unfortunately, gay people like money too. He cares more about furthering his own personal empire than he does about helping those who have less money than him.

In the eyes of timmy, the struggles of poor gay people are completely irrelevant to the struggles of rich gay people.

West was similarly eager to sell out his fans after they made him wealthy so he could suckle on trump's teat.

[–] irreticent 2 points 3 days ago

West was similarly eager to sell out his fans after they made him wealthy so he could suckle on trump's teat.

[–] iAvicenna 3 points 3 days ago

he is ultra rich, the hateful divide and conquer tactics applied to common people don't apply to him so he simply does not have any empathy for the matter.

[–] GrammarPolice 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah this is so weird. I guess it's either comply or die when it comes to this stuff

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm really not sure what the threat to him is though. Does "die" in this case mean lose out on money? One would think he already has his walk away money.

[–] GrammarPolice 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I meant it more metaphorically. I think it's more like lose out on some benefits and have to go through tons of bureaucracy if you don't comply.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah that's what I was trying to imply: that he's not supporting a bigot empowering fascist leader to save his actual skin, but to keep his personal business running smoothly.

Whereas queer folk without money are existentialy threatened by this administration and those it emboldens.

[–] GrammarPolice 2 points 3 days ago

Yup. For once we could have had a CEO choose the good side, but this just goes to show how corrupt the oligarchy is