this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
56 points (92.4% liked)

AskUSA

210 readers
517 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. [email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. [email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. [email protected]
  2. [email protected]
  3. [email protected]
  4. [email protected]
  5. [email protected]

Related communities

  1. [email protected]
  2. [email protected]
  3. [email protected]
  4. [email protected]

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it about time, or is it still useful? If you think its time has passed, what about the nickel/dime/quarter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wolfpack86 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean we need to mint more. Especially when it costs more than $0.01 to produce a penny.

You're only pointing to why we don't invalidate the coin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're only pointing to why we don't invalidate the coin.

Correct.

That doesn't mean we need to mint more.

The question wasn't if we should mint more. It was if we should do away with what we have.

[–] wolfpack86 1 points 15 hours ago

Sure, but functionally stopping the production is the main benefit of the decision. It means banks can't order more and the usage will naturally wane away.

I guess I'm saying there's a middle ground that doesn't require invalidating the currency