this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
333 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
60251 readers
5238 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Counterpoint: stop trying to make laptops thinner and implement realistic and functional air cooling
Passive cooling is generally better for reliability if you can make it work, since all active airflow systems will degrade as dust and hair works into the airflow paths.
Plus, the two can be used in combination. Improved passive cooling systems will make active cooling better by reducing the need to run the active system all the time, or at least run it at reduced rates, which will make the whole system last longer and reduce maintenance.
But this system still makes airflow right? Just without moving parts.
Or we innovate 🤷
It isn't a given that every device needs a fan anymore. For example non intel MacBook air.
Make the chassis out of aluminium so the whole bastard is a heatsink.
Slaps roof of laptop This bastard can cook so many egg omelettes
Two eggs and one sausage
Apple has been doing that for years
My laptop and older phone has this and it really does help with the added surface area.
The only issue is if you go full throttle, the section right above the CPU can fry your hand lol.
Although I only ever reached that temp doing stupid crap like hashing.
They already do. My thinkpad T14s is incredibly thin, and it can dissipate ~~400~~ 40 watts of power. My P1 dissipates 160+ watts and it’s also very thin.
You mean 40W? Can't imagine a T config that'd do 400.
Yes, single zero. 400w would indeed be VERY impressive.
This bad boy can do so much ~~crypto~~ AI
Well there's no shortage of those, and they're unusually cheaper too (unless they're specced out). I prefer a thin silent one myself, so I welcome this innovation.