this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
645 points (92.9% liked)

Comic Strips

14124 readers
3995 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shplane -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

That is such dogshit. You can buy so many things that are made by people getting fair wages and humane working conditions. Don’t act like you HAVE to buy stuff from sweatshops. You have a choice.

[–] MidsizedSedan 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Its a tough choice. $40 ethical chirt vs $9 kmart shirt. I do feel bad when shopping at kmart, but either i need a better job, or live off 2 shirts and just do washing every day

[–] shplane 4 points 2 months ago

Buy second hand at thrift stores and there’s a lot of facebook groups dedicated to giving away free stuff

[–] Psythik 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where do you live where K-Mart is still a thing?

[–] MidsizedSedan 3 points 2 months ago

Australia still has kmart

[–] Tattorack 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have serious doubts about anything labelled as "ethical".

It's like every year some investigative journalist reveals that the labels and prices on promised ethical products are bullshit.

[–] PlaidBaron 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OP would probably disagree with the concept of a fair wage under a capitalist system. Im not weighing in my opinion here, just explaining the 'no ethical consumption' angle goes much deeper than what youre envisioning.

[–] AWistfulNihilist 5 points 2 months ago

Not so much but close, the system requires winners and losers to maintain class power, it has to be possible to live a good life with the wage you make, you have to know people who engaged and succeeded. The majority also have to be left out of that in this system (credit drives the western spending in an incredible way). No matter how small and local you imagine your circle of influence, it's actually the whole world due to globalization.

You can't guarantee that a product you consume doesn't have parts that aren't made in the most disgusting of circumstances, just like you can't guarantee something was shipped by a company that was paying a living wage. You can dig as deep as you want, and you will keep unearthing fresh horrors.

We don't really have a choice. We have the illusion of choice and evils laundered into ethics.

[–] LordWiggle 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Not everyone has the financial space to spend more for a more ethical product. Some are so poor, it's the only thing they can afford. A hamburger is $1 but a broccoli is $5. A Primark shirt is $3 but a fair trade cotton shirt is $35. Many have minimum wages. It's either a sweatshop shirt and a hamburger or a fair trade shirt and no food for a week. When you have more money it's easier to buy more ethical products but sadly people with more money also consume more products and often buy sweatshop products non the less.

[–] shplane 2 points 2 months ago

The poorest people I know seem to make the effort and even support tax increases for social services. The wealthiest people I know cannot be bothered to do the right thing. People just shrug and say “I don’t want to think about that.”

[–] shplane 2 points 2 months ago

Buy second hand at thrift stores and there’s a lot of facebook groups dedicated to giving away free stuff

[–] Poxlox 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, because those companies totally disclose their use of foreign labor and shitty wages. Blaming the consumer is such a corporate tactic. Laws need to be passed at the supply side, not the consumer side. Consumers will nearly always choose the cheaper option and of you want real change you need to change the choices available. I mean, do you take the same attitude toward climate change? Why don't we all just stop using gas cars, buy only sustainably sourced food, and buy only products that are made with low emissions? Because it's not feasible for most people. They don't disclose the emissions involved in every product you buy anyway. Only with government initiative will we make any real changes, and the same applies to this meme above. If we stepped in and saved American manufacturing sooner it wouldn't have gotten this bad. Just like how our individual choices are a mere drop in the ocean of emissions since corporations (supply side) make up the super-majority of emissions, we need supply side changes, not blaming individual consumers as if you would even be able to change most people's minds.

[–] Tattorack 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Name something, anything, you can buy in a store and I'll tell you how inhumane it is.

Yes, that also includes a loaf of bread.