Casual Conversation

1910 readers

223 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Family Holiday Traditions - What are yours? (self.casualconversation)

submitted 1 month ago by Dravin to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hearing about other people's traditions is often interesting. When my wife and I got married we decided to start a Christmas Eve tradition where we'd pick a country and plan out a dinner consisting of items from it. We're making sure we've got the necessary ingredients for this year's meal and it brought to mind how comforting and fun family traditions can be.

So what does your family do this time of year (or any time of the year) that you look forward to and helps make the holiday feel like the holiday for you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dravin 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I often prepare newer-ish dishes but always filling that template that I mentioned above.

We (wife and I) love trying new dishes and that is part of why we do a new country every year. Often the result is "Huh..." and we enjoy the experience even if the dish isn't a new favorite but every once in a while we stumble across something that ends up joining our repertoire.

This year I’m going to tweak Ur’s palace cake to serve it as dessert alongside the tiramisù, my sister loves those cheese-based sweets.

That sounds interesting. If you are a fan of historical recipes (and this isn't just a one off) I can't recommend Tasting History enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I follow Tasting History! That channel is amazing, it's the perfect mix of theoretical and practical. And it's also great to have someone actually testing and showing the recipes before I try them, adapting them straight from the source is a pain (I do this sometimes with De Re Coquinaria, but I'd rather not).

The palace cake is from another channel, The World that Was. A third one that I'd recommend is Townsends, specifically for British/NA 1700s food.

Often the result is “Huh…” and we enjoy the experience even if the dish isn’t a new favorite but every once in a while we stumble across something that ends up joining our repertoire.

I think that I'm the only one doing it for the sake of history. My folks are more like "I like this", "I don't like that". Isicia omentata (Roman burgers) was such a success that it became part of the main rotation, while tuh'u (Sumerian beet and meat stew) was... well, I liked it but my folks hated it.