this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
586 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59979 readers
3950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Then you are a bad instructor, obviously.

Because it's often not like this and the difference is usually in the instructor.

That's what I take from that.

(Other than common sense about meaningless mimicking versus gradual understanding from small steps, confirmed by plenty of research about didactics.)

[–] Warl0k3 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm going to be totally honest, on a re-read I do not understand what you're trying to say here.

[–] rottingleaf 0 points 9 hours ago

Not sure which particular parts are confusing, so I'm going to guess and rephrase like this:

People are obviously different, it's obvious that a certain process can't fit all sizes, so if there's a kind of "attitude" with which that process fails, then the problem can be both with the process and with the attitude.

And in my personal experience there are processes which work just fine with that attitude.

Processes are built for human needs. Not humans are built for processes.

So the problem is with the process, which includes the instructor who seems to think that it's not.