this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
33 points (76.2% liked)

Dad Jokes

15705 readers
130 users here now

Description

This is a community for sharing those cheesy “dad” jokes that invoke an eye roll or chuckle.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was quite the paradox!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Don't get it. Suspect it doesn't actually make sense.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This joke combines the concepts associated with Pavlov and Schrödinger, two famous scientists, creating a clever wordplay that also references their respective experiments.

  1. Pavlov: Known for his classical conditioning experiment with dogs. He rang a bell before feeding dogs, conditioning them to salivate whenever they heard the bell.

  2. Schrödinger: Famous for the thought experiment Schrödinger's Cat, where a cat in a box is simultaneously alive and dead until observed. This illustrates a paradox in quantum mechanics about the nature of superposition.

The Joke:

When Pavlov and Schrödinger "bumped into each other," two things happen at once, creating the humor:

Pavlov's reaction: If something unexpected happens (like bumping into someone), the event might "trigger" a conditioned response — such as Pavlov salivating because he’s used to the bell.

Schrödinger's paradox: The joke suggests that before observation, they are both aware and unaware of bumping into each other, akin to Schrödinger's cat being alive and dead.

The Punchline: "It was quite the paradox!"

The joke itself is a paradox because it humorously combines Pavlov's predictable conditioning with Schrödinger's uncertainty, two contradictory ideas.

The wordplay is clever because "paradox" not only describes Schrödinger's cat but also the confusing situation of this fictional encounter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This reads like a LLM explanation, was it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Ofc i ain't typing allat

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Uhh.. this analysis makes no sense at all. And now OP has admitted that the joke doesn't make sense and doesn't work. Still, just for edification:

Pavlov's reaction: If something unexpected happens (like bumping into someone), the event might "trigger" a conditioned response — such as Pavlov salivating because he’s used to the bell.

There was no conditioned response.

The wordplay is clever because "paradox" not only describes Schrödinger's cat but also the confusing situation of this fictional encounter.

There was no confusion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It was just chapgpt to help you friend :)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You didn't help me, you wasted my time. Pro-tip: be quiet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

How will I ever carry on carrying this burden?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get the idea, but I don't think it works quite right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Pavlov's dog and Shrodinger's cat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Obviously. But what about them?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's my interpretation of what they were going for. If there's any deeper meaning behind it, I don't know it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

That's my interpretation of what they were going for.

I'm asking what the joke is. That's the focus here. Because it's presented as a joke. Even though it appears not to be. If you get it, please explain it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

Yeah i think it has something to do with a cat and dog

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

This is why I don't think it's presented well, because that's the only thing I get from it as well.

[–] HoneyMustardGas -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It both makes sense and doesn't at the same time but eventually the punchline might ring a bell.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Being mysterious doesn't help me I'm afraid. Still don't get it. The punchline doesn't make sense and doesn't ring a bell.

The fact that you haven't just explained the joke makes me think you can't because it doesn't work as a joke. Right?

[–] HoneyMustardGas 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They are doctors who have paradoxical theories (pair of docs) but after some research Pavlov's theory of conditioning is not a paradox so the site I ripped this joke off of may have used the wrong doctor.

[–] papalonian 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pavlov's dogs and Schrodinger's cat?

There's something there, I think, but it doesn't land as is.

I sat on it for a while and came up with this:

Pavlov and Schrodinger were flying together to a Thinker's Convention. Their plane lost power and, in effort to make a safe landing, the pilot dumped their cargo.

For citizens below, it was raining cats and dogs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

nope, still doesn't work

[–] HoneyMustardGas 0 points 14 hours ago

Some of the cats might be dead due to Shrodinger's paradox.