this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
58144 readers
4512 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not following what you're trying to say. That use of "beholden" usually means "trapped" or "obligated". If most of North America is using NACS chargers (Tesla and other brands too), then where is the trap? A consumer can simply use another brand of charger is a NACS connector (of which there will be many brands). With the open standards its not like there is a lock on who can make a charger or where that charger can be placed. If anything, most Tesla chargers are not on the best real estate.
What is your concern with all EV companies in North America using NACS once it is ratified by the SAE as a true open standard?
Sorry, I was agreeing with you, just poorly haha.
Really what I meant is like “if you want to use superchargers, regardless of connector, Tesla has to let you. But cars/chargers switching to NACS doesn’t mean that if Tesla changes their connector your car stops working”
I’m totally in favor of the change (and I love that SAE is getting involved, since that makes it feel a bit more real)
No worries! I'm the first to say I have trouble with the same.